One Jesus, Three Stories (Part 2). Why Matthew Leads with Genealogy: A King with a Bloodline

Click on the image to ORDER Kingdom Revolution (eBook & Paperback) from Amazon today!!

Understanding Why Audience Shapes Everything

You’ve been waiting. Your entire people have been waiting for centuries. The prophets made a promise, repeated it across generations: A Messiah will come. A king descended from David. Someone who will establish God’s kingdom and restore Israel’s glory. You’ve built your entire faith on these prophecies.

And then Jesus showed up.

Except he wasn’t what you expected. No armies. No throne. No overthrow of Rome’s occupation. He spent his time at dinner tables with tax collectors. He healed the sick. He told cryptic stories about kingdoms that seemed nowhere and everywhere at once. Then came the moment that shattered everything: they arrested him, tried him, crucified him like a common criminal, just like all the false messiahs your generation had seen die.

Now someone is telling you this executed peasant is the Messiah. You’re wrestling with the most devastating question imaginable: How can this possibly be true? The promises said the Messiah would come from David’s line. He’d be a king. He’d reign forever. But this man is dead. He’s been in a tomb for three days. He never did any of the things the Messiah was supposed to do.

Mark’s Gospel would offer a different answer. You’d see Jesus’s power at his baptism. Heaven torn open. God’s voice declaring his identity. Mark speaks to the part of you that desperately needs to know Jesus has authority, that he can be trusted with your life, even unto death.

Matthew does something different. His opening move seems strange by modern standards. He doesn’t begin with drama or spectacle. He opens with what appears to be the last thing you’d want to read: a genealogy. A list of names, ancestor after ancestor, tracing a bloodline back to Abraham.

“An account of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” (Matthew 1:1).

To a non-Jewish reader, this would feel tedious. But to Matthew’s audience of Jewish believers wrestling with the exact doubt we just described, this opening would feel like a lifeline. Matthew understood what his readers needed: vindication, proof, assurance that their history mattered and they hadn’t been deceived.

ORDER MY NEW BOOK TODAY FOR $9.99 (eBook)

The Question Every Jewish Reader Was Asking

To understand Matthew’s approach, we must see through his audience’s eyes. Matthew was writing around 70–90 AD, after the Temple’s destruction. His readers were Jewish believers who had lost everything when Jerusalem fell. The Temple was gone. The religious structures that held their community together were shattered. The Jewish authorities rejected Jesus. Families were divided. Some embraced Jesus as Messiah; others saw it as betrayal.

These weren’t casual believers. They were people steeped in Scripture, who could recite the Torah, who lived and breathed the messianic hope. What they desperately needed wasn’t education. They needed vindication.

Imagine their situation. You grew up Jewish. Your entire identity was rooted in Israel’s story: Abraham receiving the promise, David establishing the dynasty, the prophets declaring that a Davidic descendant would restore God’s kingdom in fullness. You memorized these prophecies. You discussed them with your rabbi. You taught them to your children. This wasn’t trivia. This was the framework of meaning for your entire existence.

Then you encountered Jesus. Something about him struck you as true. You believed. You followed. But the cost was severe: your family questioned you, synagogue authorities challenged you. And then came 70 AD. The Temple was destroyed. The city burned. Your entire people are scattered and reeling.

Now you’re asking the most challenging question: Did I make a terrible mistake? How can Jesus be the Messiah when the Temple lies in ruins? When Rome still occupies our land? The prophecies promised victory and restoration, a king on David’s throne. Instead, we have devastation.

This is the question Matthew’s genealogy answers. Not Mark’s question about Jesus’s present power. Not Luke’s question about historical credibility. Matthew’s question is simpler: Is Jesus from David’s line? Can I hold onto the promises my ancestors received?

What Matthew Shows Us

Matthew 1:1–17 presents the genealogy in a carefully constructed pattern. The opening line contains everything Matthew wants his readers to know:

“An account of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” (Matthew 1:1).

Notice the deliberate positioning. David and Abraham carry the weight of covenant promises. Abraham was the father of the nation to whom God said, “In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed.” David was the king who received God’s promise that his descendants would sit on the throne forever. By opening with these two names, Matthew declares: Jesus isn’t a new phenomenon. He’s the fulfillment of ancient promises made to your ancestors.

The genealogy traces forty-two generations, arranged with precision: fourteen from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the Babylonian exile, and fourteen from the exile to Jesus. This structure is deliberate, a theological statement hidden in genealogy.

Thus, there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the birth of the Messiah.

Three sections. Three historical epochs. Three periods of fourteen, a number that Jewish readers familiar with numerology would recognize. Fourteen equals twice seven, and seven suggests completion and covenant. Matthew declares that history itself has reached its fulfillment.

Why This Structure Changes Everything

Matthew could have listed the names in random order. Instead, he organized them into a narrative of Israel itself: Abraham to David (promise and establishment), David to exile (kingdom and judgment), exile to Jesus (waiting and restoration).

For Matthew’s traumatized readers, this structure meant everything. It said: Your entire history matters. God didn’t abandon your people during exile. Every generation, every difficulty, every triumph brought us here¾to Jesus.

This is what genealogy does. It’s not just a list, but an argument. Matthew is saying to Jewish believers reeling from the Temple’s destruction: You haven’t been deceived. You haven’t abandoned your faith. You’ve completed it.

This reveals a crucial aspect of how the audience shapes what a Gospel writer includes. Mark’s Roman readers would have found this genealogy meaningless. A list of Jewish names? Why would Rome care? But Matthew’s Jewish readers found it essential, the very thing they desperately needed to see. They needed the unbroken chain. They needed genealogy to prove what their hearts hoped was true.

The David Connection: Everything Hinges on This

For a Jewish reader, one name dominated: David.

When Matthew traces the line directly to David and emphasizes it in his opening, “Jesus the Messiah, the son of David,” he answers the most specific claim about the Messiah in Jewish expectation. The prophets didn’t just promise a Messiah. They promised a Davidic Messiah. Isaiah 9 declared that a child would be born to the house of David, and of the increase of his government there would be no end. Jeremiah promised that a righteous king would come from David's descendants. Psalm 89 sealed it: God’s covenant promise to David’s line would never fail.

Matthew proves this genealogically, step by step, tracing David’s line through Solomon, through the kingdom, through the exile, and finally to Joseph, Jesus’s earthly father, who descended directly from David.

By the time a Jewish reader finished reading this genealogy, they had seen the unbroken chain: Jesus isn’t just claiming to be Messiah. He is descended from David. The prophecies apply. The promises are kept.

The Hidden Story: Women, Outsiders, and What Kind of Messiah This Is

Something else happens in Matthew’s genealogy that would have caught careful readers’ attention. Hidden within these forty-two generations are four women, and their inclusion breaks every convention of Hebrew genealogy:

Tamar, listed as “whose mother was Tamar.” Her story, preserved in Genesis 38, is shocking. She disguised herself as a prostitute, slept with her father-in-law Judah to secure her rights, and became pregnant with twins, including Perez, who stands in Jesus’s direct line. In a normal genealogy, she’d never be mentioned.

Rahab, the Canaanite prostitute who sheltered Israel’s spies before Jericho fell. A foreigner. A woman of questionable reputation. Yet Matthew notes she is Boaz’s mother.

Ruth, the Moabite widow. Deuteronomy explicitly forbade Moabites from entering the assembly of the Lord. They were enemies, not potential ancestors. Yet Ruth married Boaz and became the great-grandmother of King David.

Mary, mentioned last as the one “of whom Jesus was born.” A deliberate inclusion in Matthew’s genealogy.

This pattern would have startled Jewish readers. Hebrew genealogies didn’t name women; they traced the male line exclusively. Yet Matthew deliberately chose to name these women, especially women whose stories challenged Jewish expectations about purity and ethnicity.

Why? Because Matthew’s readers needed more than proof that Jesus descended from David. They needed to understand what kind of Messiah he would be. By weaving women, especially foreign women with complicated pasts, into the Davidic lineage, Matthew sent a message echoed throughout his Gospel: This Messiah doesn’t come to a pure, isolated people. He comes through outsiders. He comes through women whose cleverness ensured survival. He comes through the unexpected and marginalized.

The genealogy answers one question: Is he from David’s line? But it hints at a deeper one: What kind of Messiah is this? Who will He welcome?

How Matthew’s Audience Determined His Entire Approach

Matthew didn’t write his Gospel the way he did because it’s the best way to tell the story of Jesus. He wrote it this way because his audience needed it. Their doubts. Their questions. Their crisis of faith. Everything shaped what Matthew included.

Compare Mark and Matthew: Mark opens with baptism and revelation. Matthew begins with genealogy and promise. Same Jesus. Different Gospel. Different audience.

Throughout his Gospel, Matthew emphasizes what Mark barely mentions. When Jesus teaches, Matthew records extended teachings like the Sermon on the Mount, material that Mark largely omits. Why? Because Matthew’s Jewish readers needed to hear Jesus teach about how the old fits with the new, how the Law transforms rather than disappears.

Matthew also repeatedly uses: “This happened to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet...” Luke mentions fulfillment occasionally. Mark mentions it rarely. Matthew hammers this point home. Why? Because his Jewish readers were comparing Jesus to their messianic expectations. They needed to see, systematically, how Jesus matched the promises their ancestors received.

Even Jesus’s teaching style in Matthew reflects his audience. Matthew’s Jesus engages directly with questions about the Law. Matthew preserves Jesus saying, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” (Matthew 5:17). To a Roman Gentile in Mark’s audience, this would mean nothing. But to a Jew trying to remain faithful to both Torah and Jesus, these words were salvation.

This is what it means for an audience to shape not just content, but structure, emphasis, tone, and the entire theological architecture of a Gospel.

The Incarnation According to Matthew

When theologians speak of “incarnation,” they typically mean something abstract: God becoming human. But the four Gospels present strikingly different interpretations.

For Mark, incarnation means divine invasion: God confronting evil, casting out demons, commanding creation.

For Matthew, incarnation means fulfillment: God becoming human not to destroy the world, but to complete it. Not to nullify the promises, but to keep them. Jesus isn’t a radical break from Israel’s history. He’s the moment history reaches its intended destination.

This explains why Matthew’s genealogy carries such theological weight. It’s an incarnational statement declaring: The God who keeps His promises doesn’t start over. He works through history, through the unexpected, through flawed humans making choices, sometimes stumbling, sometimes failing, yet always part of His larger plan. All of it culminates here: God becoming human in Jesus, the Son of David, heir to all the promises.

Matthew presents incarnation as fundamentally about continuity. Yes, Jesus does something radically new. His teaching transforms understanding of the Law. His kingdom transcends political expectations. But this newness isn’t disconnected from the past; it’s the fulfillment of what was always promised.

When Matthew includes those women, Tamar the clever, Rahab the foreigner, Ruth the outsider, Mary the unlikely vessel, he reveals what incarnation looks like in practice. God doesn’t work through the pure and perfect. He works through the broken, the marginalized, the surprising. The incarnation, for Matthew, is God working through generations of flawed humans, women and men, insiders and outsiders, to bring about His purposes.

How This Changes How You Read Matthew

Understanding Matthew’s audience transforms how you read his Gospel. Suddenly, patterns that seemed random become clear.

Notice Matthew’s emphasis on Jesus as teacher. Mark preserves fewer teachings. Luke focuses more on narrative and individuals. But Matthew structures his entire Gospel around five major teaching blocks: the Sermon on the Mount, parables about the kingdom, instructions to the disciples, warnings about the future, and the passion narrative. Why? Because his Jewish audience desperately needed to hear Jesus teach about how the old fits with the new, how the Law transforms rather than disappears.

Notice, too, how Matthew alone preserves Jesus's saying: “I came not to abolish but to fulfill.” This was Matthew answering the fundamental anxiety gripping his readers: If I follow Jesus, what happens to my Judaism? Am I betraying my heritage? Jesus’s answer, preserved by Matthew for these exact people, is direct: No. You’re completing it.

Or consider Matthew’s treatment of the disciples. Like Mark, Matthew shows them confused and failing. But Matthew adds what Mark doesn’t: after Jesus’s resurrection, Matthew ends with the Great Commission. Jesus instructs them to “make disciples of all nations, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.” The disciples aren’t left wondering. They understand their calling. Why? Matthew’s readers needed assurance that following Jesus had clarity and purpose. They weren’t walking into chaos. They were walking into a continuation of what God had always been doing, transformed and renewed.

What This Means for Your Own Reading

Here’s the spiritual insight at the heart of Matthew’s Gospel: God completes His promises. He doesn’t start over. He doesn’t waste history.

Matthew teaches a powerful truth: when God makes a promise, He keeps it. Not by erasing history. By bringing it to fullness. If doubts about God’s faithfulness plague you, Matthew’s genealogy speaks directly to that fear. Forty-two generations. Three historical epochs. Each one is proof that God was present, at work, moving toward His purposes.

But Matthew teaches something equally important: how God works in the world. God doesn’t work through the pure and perfect. He works through the unexpected. Through women like Tamar and Ruth, who had to be clever to survive. Through Rahab, a foreigner who protected God’s people. Through ordinary people making choices, some wise, some complicated, all woven into God’s larger purposes.

When you read Matthew’s Gospel, you’re holding someone’s passionate response to a crisis of faith. You’re reading a defense of Jesus’s messianic identity written by someone who understood his traumatized, doubting audience perfectly. Matthew knew these Jewish believers needed reassurance. They needed to know their history mattered. Their faith made sense.

And if you find yourself in doubt or crisis, questioning whether God has forgotten His promises, whether your faith can survive cultural pressure, or whether God can work through the broken chapters of your life, Matthew’s genealogy has a message for you: You are part of a much longer story. Your life, your faith, your struggles are part of something God is completing.

The Pattern Across the Gospels

Understanding Matthew’s approach reveals something we began to see in Mark: The four Gospels aren’t four identical accounts of the same events. They are four testimonies shaped by four distinct communities in four different circumstances.

Mark writes for persecuted Roman believers who desperately need assurance that Jesus has the power to sustain them through suffering. Mark gives them a Jesus who is present, decisive, and undeniably powerful.

Matthew writes for conflicted Jewish believers who desperately need assurance that believing in Jesus doesn’t betray their heritage. Matthew gives them a genealogy, teachings about the Law, and the promise that all the prophecies point to Jesus.

Luke will give his audience something entirely different. But we’re getting ahead of ourselves.

The point is this: by learning to read Matthew as a response to his specific audience, you’re developing crucial biblical literacy. You’re learning to ask the right questions: Who wrote this? What was their community facing? What doubts kept them awake at night? These questions transform Bible reading from passive consumption to active understanding. They help you see why the Gospels differ, and what those differences reveal about Jesus and about God’s character.

And when you recognize that Matthew wrote for a specific audience with specific needs, you begin to ask: What do I need to see about Jesus? What are my specific doubts? What community am I part of? The Gospels become messages written directly to you, because they were written for people asking the kinds of questions you ask.

Coming Next

Part 3: “Luke’s Birth Story: Why Historical Detail Matters to Outsiders”

If Mark’s Jesus confronts evil through power, and Matthew’s Jesus completes promises through genealogy, what does incarnation look like for Luke’s audience? Discover how Luke’s entirely different approach to Jesus’s birth reveals what Gentile believers needed to hear most. And explore why Luke is the only Gospel writer to tell us that Jesus was born in a manger, and what that detail meant to the people he was writing for.

——

FYI: Some of the links above are affiliate links. If you choose to purchase items linked, I will receive a small commission from that sale.

If you find this blog helpful and want to say thanks, click here to buy Danny Davis a coffee.