One Jesus, Three Stories (Part 1): Why Doesn’t Mark Tell us the Christmas Story?

Click on the image to ORDER Kingdom Revolution (eBook & Paperback) from Amazon today!!

Understanding Gospel Audiences and Incarnational Theology

You know the Christmas story. You’ve heard it at candlelight services and sung it in carols. Wise men from the east following a star. Angels announcing to shepherds in the field. A teenager named Mary, saying yes to something impossible. A baby in a manger because there was no room at the inn. It’s beautiful. It’s sacred. It’s woven into the fabric of how we celebrate Jesus’s arrival.

But here’s something most people never notice: two of the four Gospels don’t tell this story.

Mark’s Gospel opens with John the Baptist. No genealogy. No angels. No manger. No wise men. No shepherds. No star. It’s as if Mark decided to skip the entire Christmas story and jump straight to the action. His first sentence is almost abrupt: “The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God.” Then, immediately, John is baptizing people in the wilderness.

(Note: John’s Gospel takes yet another approach entirely—it opens with the Prologue about the Word becoming flesh, a deeply theological rather than historical account. But in this series, we’re focusing on the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) because they share a similar tradition and offer fascinating insights into how the audience shapes the incarnation narrative.)

And if you’re like most readers, you might think: Where’s the birth story? Did Mark just forget to include it? Is this Gospel incomplete?

But here’s what I want you to know: Mark didn’t forget anything. His choice to omit the nativity narrative reveals something profound about who he was writing for. And it’s going to change the way you read not just Mark, but all four Gospels. Because it turns out that understanding why the Gospels differ is one of the most important Bible study skills you can develop.

ORDER MY NEW BOOK TODAY FOR $9.99 (eBook)

What Mark Actually Says (Mark 1:1-11)

Before we can understand why Mark omits the birth narrative, let’s look at what he actually gives us. Mark 1:1-11 is spare and urgent:

“The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God, as it is written in Isaiah the prophet: ‘I will send my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way.’ ‘A voice of one calling in the wilderness, Prepare the way for the Lord, make straight paths for him.’ And so John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. The whole Judean countryside and all the people of Jerusalem went out to him. Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River. As Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove. And a voice came from heaven: ‘You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.’”

That’s it. That’s Mark’s opening proclamation. No backstory. No explanation of where Jesus came from. No family tree. No context. Just: Here’s who prepares the way. Here’s where Jesus appears. Here’s what God says about Him.

If you’re reading Mark for the first time without knowing Matthew and Luke’s nativity accounts, you might wonder: Who is this Jesus? Where did He come from? What’s His family situation? Mark never tells you. And that’s intentional.

The Audience Changes Everything

Here’s where understanding audience becomes crucial. This is why I want you to hold this idea throughout this entire series.

Mark was writing for Roman Gentile believers, likely around 55-65 AD, in the shadow of Emperor Nero’s persecution. His readers weren’t Jewish. They hadn’t grown up with Israel’s story or her hopes for a messiah king. They didn’t know about the line of David or centuries of prophecy. They were ordinary Roman people—some wealthy, many not—who had recently become followers of Jesus despite living under an empire that viewed this new faith with suspicion, and increasingly, with violence.

For these readers, the questions that drove Matthew and Luke’s narratives meant nothing. A genealogy proving Jesus descended from Israel’s ancient kings? Why would Rome care about that? Prophecies from Jewish scripture? Most had never heard them. No, what they needed was radically different. They needed to know: Who is this man, really? Can I trust him enough to die for him? What makes Him worth my life when I don’t even have their centuries of religious tradition to lean on?

And Mark answers that question not through genealogy, but through revelation.

 Why Mark’s Approach Makes Sense for His Audience

But what does this look like in practice? To understand why Mark chose this approach, imagine the reality facing his first readers.

You’re in Rome around 60 AD. You’ve recently become a follower of a Jewish teacher who was executed by the Roman state. And now, whether Nero has already begun scapegoating Christians or you’re sensing the shift in the political climate, you’re starting to understand that your faith might cost you everything. But here’s the thing: you don’t have years of religious training to hold onto. You didn’t grow up hearing how the Messiah was supposed to come. If anything, you’ve heard stories about other would-be messiahs.

In your lifetime, you’ve heard the stories. Judas the Galilean claimed to be the Messiah and led a rebellion against Rome. He was crucified. Theudas gathered followers in the wilderness, promising miracles and liberation. Roman soldiers slaughtered him and his followers. The Egyptian appeared in Jerusalem claiming divine authority. Rome killed him too. Every one of them promised freedom. Every single one ended dead, their followers scattered, their movements crushed. The pattern was unmistakable.

So when you hear someone say, “Follow this Jesus. He’s the Messiah,” your first question isn’t theological. It’s survival: “Why should I believe this one? What makes Him different? Won’t He end up on a cross like the others?”

Mark understood exactly what his audience needed. His Gospel doesn’t unfold like a biography meant to charm you with Jesus’s humble beginnings. It reads like a pronouncement of power. Every page demonstrates what his audience was desperately asking: What makes Him different from the false messiahs we’ve already seen die? What gives Him the right to ask us to follow Him into danger?

So Mark does something brilliant: he lets the baptism show rather than tell. He doesn’t explain Jesus’s identity through genealogy or backstory. He reveals it through the moment God’s voice tears through heaven and declares it publicly: “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.” (Mark 1:11). It’s a moment of divine coronation, witnessed by John and the Spirit. For a Roman reader who understood how power works in this empire, this declaration carried weight that no family tree ever could.

In Mark’s telling, incarnation isn’t about the circumstances of birth. It’s about the unveiling of identity. The Messiah doesn’t arrive in a manger with angels singing. He’s revealed at the Jordan River with heaven torn open and God’s voice confirming his authority. This is the moment his persecuted audience needed to witness.

 The World Behind Mark’s Gospel

This revelation at the Jordan isn’t Mark’s final argument. It’s his opening move. After the baptism, Jesus doesn’t retreat to teach in parables or explain His theology. He acts. Immediately, He enters a synagogue where a demon-possessed man shouts at Him. Immediately, He heals Simon’s mother-in-law. Immediately, crowds gather. Immediately, He withdraws to pray, then goes out preaching and casting demons out of the possessed. The action accelerates, relentless, unstoppable.

Mark uses the word “immediately” (or similar urgency language) forty times throughout his Gospel. This isn’t careless repetition or the mark of a rushed writer. It’s a deliberate strategy. His narrative pace mirrors what his persecuted audience desperately needed to experience: the momentum of Jesus’s kingdom breaking through the world’s opposition, the sense that God’s power was active right now, not some future hope.

What does this rhythm do for a reader? When you’re wrestling with doubt, when you’re wondering if your faith is real enough to die for, you don’t want theological arguments about divine power. You want evidence! You want to watch demons flee at Jesus’s word. You want to see storms obey His command. You want proof that this isn’t just another failed religious movement that Rome will crush like all the others.

But here’s what reveals Mark’s genius: he doesn’t just display Jesus’s power. He structures his entire Gospel around the disciples’ failure to understand it. They’re the ones closest to Jesus, best positioned to grasp who He is, yet they consistently get it wrong. Peter confesses, “You are the Messiah”—perfectly right—and moments later, Jesus calls him Satan for refusing to accept the cross. The disciples watch as Jesus commands a storm to be silent and remain terrified. They witness miracle after miracle yet stay confused, bewildered, unable to see what should be obvious.

Why would Mark present his own disciples so negatively? Because his audience was those disciples. His readers were confused. They were afraid. They had just met this Jewish teacher and were asked to make the ultimate commitment: follow Him into possible death, based on incomplete understanding.

By showing the disciples’ journey from confusion to conviction, Mark tells his persecuted readers something vital: Your doubt is permitted. Your fear is understandable. Even Jesus’s closest followers struggled to understand who He was. But keep watching what He does. Pay close attention to how He responds under pressure. And gradually, the truth becomes undeniable. He is genuinely, unmistakably different from every false messiah who came before Him.

 The Incarnation According to Mark

This journey from confusion to conviction reveals a critical aspect of Mark’s entire theology of incarnation. When theologians use the word “incarnation,” they typically mean something abstract: God becoming human. But Mark thinks far more concretely. For Mark, incarnation doesn’t simply imply that God existed as a human being. It means God invaded human reality: addressing it, confronting it, transforming it from within.

Look at what happens immediately after the baptism. Mark 1:12-13: “At once the Spirit sent him out into the wilderness, and he was in the wilderness forty days, being tempted by Satan. And the wild animals were there, and angels attended him.” This isn’t a quiet spiritual retreat. This is incarnation in direct conflict. God in human form, facing down Satan himself. Wild beasts. Celestial beings. The collision of heaven and earth.

And this pattern runs throughout Mark’s entire Gospel. Incarnation isn’t a historical event locked in the past. It’s an ongoing, active engagement with the powers of darkness and human suffering. When a demon-possessed man encounters Jesus, the spirit shrieks: “What do you want with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are—the Holy One of God!” The demonic realm trembles because it recognizes incarnation for what it is: God’s direct intervention in history, the disruption of evil’s domain.

Watch how Mark describes the baptism: “The heavens were torn open and the Spirit descended on him like a dove.” (Mark 1:10). Not gently opened. Torn. The barrier between visible and invisible worlds doesn’t dissolve peacefully—it ruptures. Heaven and earth collide. The distance between God and humanity vanishes in an instant.

Matthew will show you incarnation as the fulfillment of prophecy. Luke will anchor it in historical detail. John will explore it as the eternal God becoming flesh. Mark? Mark shows you incarnation as militant action. Incarnation confronting demons. Incarnation healing the sick. Incarnation challenging every authority structure that stands against God’s kingdom. Incarnation facing death itself and refusing to back down.

For a persecuted believer, Mark’s understanding offered what no other Gospel could: evidence that God wasn’t watching from heaven. He was here, in the dirt, in the midst of suffering, actively subduing the forces that opposed His people. If you followed this incarnate God, you weren’t following a failed religious figure destined for Rome’s cross. You were following someone the demonic realm itself feared.

How This Changes How You Read Mark

Understanding Mark’s audience transforms your reading of his Gospel. Suddenly, small details that seemed peripheral or incomplete begin to make perfect sense. When you realize Mark was writing for Gentiles with zero Jewish background, his explanations of Jewish customs suddenly stand out. He writes: “Talitha koum!” and immediately adds, “which means, ‘Little girl, I say to you, get up.’” He translates Aramaic throughout, “Abba” (Father), “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?)—because his readers had never heard these words. These translations aren’t random editorial asides. They’re Mark speaking directly to his audience: “This is foreign to you. Let me help you understand.”

The Gospel’s breakneck pacing also clicks into place. A first-time reader might think Mark’s story moves too quickly from scene to scene, rarely pausing for explanation or theological reflection. But that rhythm isn’t poor writing. It’s perfectly calibrated for readers in crisis, who can’t afford leisurely theological study. They need one core message: Here’s who Jesus is. Here’s what He can do. Here’s why you can trust Him with your life.

Then there’s the “messianic secret”—the pattern scholars notice where Jesus repeatedly tells people not to reveal His identity. Someone’s son is healed of demons, and Jesus says, “Don’t tell anyone.” Peter confesses Jesus as the Messiah, and Jesus immediately silences him. Even the title “Messiah” feels dangerous in Mark. Why? Because for Mark’s readers, revealing Jesus’s true identity could mean arrest. It could mean crucifixion. Secrecy isn’t mysterious. It’s a reflection of the actual danger his community faced. Mark’s narrative strategy mirrors his audience’s reality.

What This Means for Your Own Reading

Here’s the practical takeaway: Understanding why Mark omits the birth narrative teaches you far more than Bible trivia. It teaches you a skill that will transform how you read Scripture: Always ask who is writing and why they’re writing it.

The four Gospels aren’t four identical accounts of the same events. They are four different testimonies shaped by four distinct communities in four different circumstances. Matthew writes for Jewish believers trying to see Jesus as the continuation and fulfillment of their entire history. Luke writes for Gentiles seeking historical credibility and emotional connection. Mark writes for persecuted believers who need absolute certainty that the person they’re following has the power to sustain them through suffering and death.

Here is the spiritual insight that changes everything: Mark understood something about incarnation that comfort and security might obscure. When your faith costs you everything, when you’re facing persecution or doubt or genuine crisis, you don’t need theological arguments. You need to know that God is present. That He’s actively confronting the powers opposing you. That His kingdom is breaking through your circumstances right now, not just in some distant past or future. Mark gives his readers exactly that.

Maybe in the struggles you face, whether persecution or doubt or deep personal difficulty, Mark has something to teach you that the other Gospels don’t quite capture. The next time you open Mark, remember you’re not reading an incomplete Gospel. You’re reading a Gospel forged in the crucible of crisis, crafted with divine precision for a specific moment and a specific people. Every omission is intentional. Every detail included serves a purpose. Mark chose his approach because his audience desperately needed to know that Jesus wasn’t just an interesting religious teacher. He was the incarnate God, actively present, undeniably powerful.

This changes how you read Mark. But it changes something deeper: how you read the entire Bible. It teaches you that God doesn’t speak in only one way. He meets His people where they are. The incarnation Matthew emphasizes is real. The incarnation Luke emphasizes is real. But the active, present, powerful incarnation Mark shows to suffering believers is also real. And maybe it’s just what you need to see right now.

Coming Next

Part 2: “Matthew’s Genealogy: Why Jewish Readers Needed a King”

If Mark’s Jesus is the mighty God confronting evil in real time, what does incarnation look like for Matthew’s audience? Discover how Matthew’s entirely different approach to Jesus’s birth reveals what Jewish believers needed to see about the Messiah. And prepare to be surprised by how much Matthew’s genealogy isn’t about bloodline, it’s about something far more radical.

——

FYI: Some of the links above are affiliate links. If you choose to purchase items linked, I will receive a small commission from that sale.

If you find this blog helpful and want to say thanks, click here to buy Danny Davis a coffee.